This teaching was given to me freely.
My teacher spent years walking me through it, answering my questions late into the evening, week after week. Behind her was her own teacher, and behind him a lineage going back over 2000 years — each person passing on what they had received and asking the next person to do the same.
I am not a swami. I am not a scholar. I am a student who was changed by this teaching, and my teacher has told me I now have a responsibility to pass it on.
* * *
She said something to me once that I have not forgotten. Teaching is the best way to learn.
I resisted it at first. I told her I was not ready. She had heard that excuse before. She was also right. Five years into teaching small groups, I understand things now that ten years of private study would not have given me. A student’s question — sharp, unexpected, undefended — can reach what hours of reading cannot. It exposes the places where my understanding is still vague.
So I teach for two reasons. To pay forward what was given to me. And because teaching is the deepest form of learning I have found.
* * *
A few principles have shaped how I teach.
This teaching does not require religion. You do not need to be Hindu, Indian, or religious in any conventional sense. Vedanta is not a faith you adopt. It is a way of looking carefully at your own experience. Many of my students hold their existing faith and find no conflict with it. Vedanta is asking a different kind of question.
It does not contradict science, and does not depend on it. Vedanta and science are looking at different things. The teaching may sometimes ask you to follow reason further than you are accustomed to, but it is never illogical.
This is not about belief. It is about understanding. Vedanta is not asking you to believe anything on faith. It is asking you to look — at your own experience, your own awareness, your own assumptions — and to test what you find. Questions are welcome.
Sanskrit is not the gatekeeper. The tradition has a vast technical vocabulary, and for someone meeting this teaching for the first time, that vocabulary is a wall, not a door. I have spent years studying Sanskrit and read several scriptures in the original. It is not necessary. Where a Sanskrit term is genuinely useful, I introduce it once and then mostly use plain English.
* * *
My aim is to get to the essence and remove the scaffolding that has been built around it over the centuries. What has been handed down for over 2000 years is simple at its core. That is what makes it possible for me to share it with you here, in plain language, on a small screen.
If you are willing to look honestly at your own experience and follow the inquiry where it leads — that is enough.
Let us begin.
* * *
Dhiraj Malik
Fremont, CA
May 2026